Friday, September 19, 2008
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
I have a new theory when it comes to this campaign and the republican party. The republicans are not trying to win the most elections they are trying to get their policies carried out. They have already went into war with Iraq, so that no matter who wins the election it will look like American imperialism when the president reforms that nation into a ally of America again. They have no respect for human decency or cultures. They also talk of winning a war,. When winning a war is never an issue. It is impossible to win a war. War is terrible. The sooner they end the better off for both sides. I'm listening to Sarah Palin right now speaking and it is incredibly ignorant of the issues. It makes me very angry, because they will lie to people in order to look good. This is part two to my theory they want to piss off as many people as they can with irrelevant forms of politics like the lipstick remark by Sen. Obama. They use this to turn people like me off from the issues because when we're trying to here their stance we get so irritated we can no longer listen to the nonsense and propaganda-like campaign speeches. Lies all lies. They lied to us the whole time during President Bush's administration and they will do it again if they win, because that is all they've done the entire campaign. Now when I'm out on the street and someone says why don't you vote for McCain don't you now his stance on the issues. I have no debate for them. I haven't heard any straight talk. I can't listen past the bull. First they give us a failed businessman for President and wonder why the economy is failing. Then they give us a horrible soldier(I'll say it because nobody else will) and guess where the military will be doing(Failed strategy). I call McCain a horrible soldier because that is what you call someone when they crash their plane five times. A horrible failure. He also is the most eligible candidate to be the Manchurian candidate. He was captured by the enemy for however many years.
If Obama wins the election he will have to use his diplomatic skills to set up a government system in Iraq which will be favorable to United States policy. That is American Imperialism. That is something that we were not supposed to do. When we were going to war at first many thought it was for oil. They denied it. They being the current administration and the republican party. They wanted to set up a government in the middle east in order for them to have control over their resources. Obama has no choice in the matter. McCain would do the same, but I think they(republican party) want Obama as president because he will be more effective. If McCain wins I expect more wars for more resources and more imperialism. Which will eventually lead to a new cold war. Their current campaign tactics are not for winning this campaign but maybe the next one. Their making points so that Obama has to dig himself into a hole and will not be able to fulfill his promises making him cater more and more to everyone.
You don't have to believe me do your own research. Palin says she stopped the bridge to nowhere when she asked for millions of dollars for it. It was never built, but what does that mean? It means that she was probably denied. When she says she fought the good ol boys who is she talking about for the past 8 years the good ol boys have been people in the republican party like George Bush and John McCain. She saying she was against them(yeah right!). She is not capable of being a president. She just a pitbull with lipstick. I don't think it is intelligent to have children right before you become president. Many will say I wouldn't have said this about a male candidate but I would. Families with infants have a lot of work to do. I even think that Obama's children are just in range for him to be reaching these aspirations. I would not care about the family issues at all though if they weren't using them as some publicity stunt. I mean come on. She doesn't believe in condoms. Abstinence is a better way to be safe, but condoms are still something that keeps people safe from disease.
In closing you don't have to listen to them(republicans). they(republicans) are distorting the issues. Twisting words around and using propaganda. Hitler used propaganda to turn people against a culture. So have they(republicans). You do however have to listen to Obama and the democratic party. We have to understand what exactly are their strategies and policies. So that when they are far from our needs we can correct them. The democrats are always quickly taken out of office as soon as they make a mistake. Thinking back to Grey Davis the democratic governor of Cali before the Terminator. He made a huge mistake breaking up the monopoly The Edison Company had on energy. It as the right thing to do but it was the wrong way to do it. He caused energy rates to go sky high. Did Arnold come in and change anything? Did he make it right? No. Of course not. He just was able to take office because the current governor made a mistake. If everytime the republicans made a mistake we replaced them then we would have impeached the president long ago. How can we impeach for morality and not for failed policy?(rhetorical question for effect not information)
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Leaning toward Democrat
PAST TYPOLOGY COUNTERPART: Liberal Democrats/Seculars/60's Democrats
17% OF GENERAL POPULATION
19% OF REGISTERED VOTERS
PARTY ID: 59% Democrat; 40% Independent/No Preference, 1% Republican (92% Dem/Lean Dem)
BASIC DESCRIPTION: This group has nearly doubled in proportion since 1999. Liberal Democrats now comprise the largest share of Democrats. They are the most opposed to an assertive foreign policy, the most secular, and take the most liberal views on social issues such as homosexuality, abortion, and censorship. They differ from other Democratic groups in that they are strongly pro-environment and pro-immigration.
DEFINING VALUES: Strongest preference for diplomacy over use of military force. Pro-choice, supportive of gay marriage and strongly favor environmental protection. Low participation in religious activities. Most sympathetic of any group to immigrants as well as labor unions, and most opposed to the anti-terrorism Patriot Act.
|Relying too much on military force to defeat terrorism creates hatred that leads to more terrorism||51%||90%|
|I worry the government is getting too involved in the issue of morality||51%||88%|
|Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost||60%||89%|
|Poor people have hard lives because government benefits don't go far enough to help them live decently||52%||80%|
WHO THEY ARE: Most (62%) identify themselves as liberal. Predominantly white (83%), most highly educated group (49% have a college degree or more), and youngest group after Bystanders. Least religious group in typology: 43% report they seldom or never attend religious services; nearly a quarter (22%) are seculars. More than one-third never married (36%). Largest group residing in urban areas (42%) and in the western half the country (34%). Wealthiest Democratic group (41% earn at least $75,000).
LIFESTYLE NOTES: Largest group to have been born (or whose parents were born) outside of the U.S. or Canada (20%). Least likely to have a gun in the home (23%) or attend bible study or prayer group meetings (13%).
2004 ELECTION: Bush 2%, Kerry 81%
MEDIA USE: Liberals are second only to Enterprisers in following news about government and public affairs most of the time (60%). Liberals' use of the internet to get news is the highest among all groups (37%).
That's my bias.
Now that that is out in the open we can get into this